Engineers own the credits
Every credit gets an owner and an evidence route at the start. Review comments are answered by the engineer who ran the study, not by a coordinator reading it for the first time.
Hit your LEED and Mostadam targets with no surprises. Credits engineered into the design, evidence ready before the reviewer asks, and every comment answered by the engineer who ran the study.
Your green rating starts in the design, not in the paperwork.
Who this is for Contractors handed a green scope, developers choosing a rating, and design teams that want the credits secured early.
Price this scopeLEED v5, Mostadam or both. You see the achievable level, the cost premium and the programme impact before you commit a riyal.
Credit requirements written into the architectural, structural and MEP design and into the specification while changes still cost little.
Whole-building baseline and proposed models to ASHRAE 90.1 Appendix G that show where the energy points are, with every input listed for the reviewer.
Daylight and glare, thermal comfort, PV yield and whole-building life-cycle assessment, each issued as a clear report a reviewer can check.
Submittals checked against credit requirements, EPD and recycled-content evidence collected, waste diversion tracked and IAQ plans run, so the points survive construction.
Credit forms, narratives and calculations submitted on Arc, GBCI's platform for LEED v5, with every reviewer comment answered by the engineer who ran the analysis.
Credit feasibility before the design is fixed, and a target certification level chosen with the numbers in front of you.
Project registration and a credit ownership matrix that says who owes what.
Energy modelling to ASHRAE 90.1 Appendix G: baseline and proposed.
Daylight, glare and thermal comfort simulations.
Indoor environmental quality strategy and the monitoring that evidences it.
Materials documentation: EPDs, HPDs and regional materials.
Construction waste management and indoor air quality management plans.
Mostadam Residential and Mostadam Buildings, run alongside or instead of LEED.
Hit your LEED and Mostadam targets with no surprises. Credits engineered into the design, evidence ready before the reviewer asks, and every comment answered by the engineer who ran the study.
Every credit gets an owner and an evidence route at kickoff, so nothing turns out to be unprovable at submission.
The energy model is exported from the BIM model, not redrawn, so the simulation and the drawings always describe the same building.
Occupancy, schedules, setpoints and weather file are stated in every report, so a reviewer never has to ask what was assumed.
Review comments go to the engineer who ran the study, not to a coordinator reading it for the first time. Faster answers, fewer rounds.
80 / 110
Highest scorecard tracked
ZHI Headquarters · LEED BD+C
3
LEED versions covered
v4 · v4.1 · v5, across BD+C, ID+C and O+M
8
Disciplines under one roof
Every credit has an engineer who owns it
48h
Average proposal turnaround
Send the brief, receive a scoped offer
Every credit gets an owner and an evidence route at the start. Review comments are answered by the engineer who ran the study, not by a coordinator reading it for the first time.
Energy models, daylight studies, quantities and schedules come out of the coordinated BIM model, so the simulation and the drawings describe the same building.
Credit requirements are written into the design and the specification while they are still cheap, so nothing is discovered to be unprovable at submission.
USGBC keeps LEED v4 and v4.1 registration open until 30 June 2027. We test your project against v4.1 and v5 before you register, so the version is a decision and not a default.
LEED v4 · v4.1 · v5
Fit-out
Buildings in use
Run alone or alongside LEED on one evidence set
Rating system, version and target level tested against your design, with the cost premium and programme impact of each route.
Project registered, scorecard fixed, and every credit given an owner, an evidence route and a date in the programme.
Credits written into the drawings and the specification. Energy, daylight and LCA models run from the BIM model.
Submittals reviewed against credit requirements. Waste diversion, IAQ plans and commissioning evidence tracked monthly.
Forms, narratives and calculations submitted on Arc, GBCI's platform for LEED v5, and every reviewer comment answered through to the final ruling.
Evidence is designed in, not chased afterwards. Two-stage quality control on every submission: discipline check, then independent senior review.
| LEED category | What the BIM model carries | Evidence it produces |
|---|---|---|
| Integrative Process | Early massing and envelope options held in one model | Simple-box energy and water budget analyses that steer the design |
| Location & Transportation | Site model, parking and cycle-storage counts, EV bays | Parking footprint, bicycle facilities and EV charging calculations |
| Sustainable Sites | Hardscape, roof and landscape areas tagged with SRI values | Heat island, open space and rainwater management calculations |
| Water Efficiency | Fixture families with flow and flush rates, irrigated areas | Indoor and outdoor water-use calculators, water metering plan |
| Energy & Atmosphere | Zones, envelope, glazing, lighting and HVAC data | ASHRAE 90.1 Appendix G model, energy metering, renewable sizing |
| Materials & Resources | Element quantities and material parameters: EPD, recycled content, origin | Whole-building LCA, BPDO product tracking, C&D waste baseline |
| Indoor Environmental Quality | Room geometry, glazing, ventilation rates and finish materials | Daylight (sDA / ASE), views, ASHRAE 62.1 and low-emitting materials logs |
| Construction phase | 4D sequence and site logistics | IAQ management and waste-diversion tracking against the programme |
One model, one evidence register: every credit has an owner, a document and a status.
Dynamic, hourly, whole-building models that stand up to a reviewer: for LEED, Mostadam, SBC 601 and investment decisions.
Weather file, schedules, setpoints, loads and tariffs are issued for your review, then confirmed and locked before any simulation runs.
Zones, envelope and areas are exported from the coordinated model, so the simulation and the drawings describe the same building.
Identical models that differ only in the measure under study, so every saving is attributable to that measure.
Assumptions stated, results traceable, and review comments answered by the engineer who ran the study.
80 of 110 points
Scorecard band Platinum
| Credit | Points earned |
|---|---|
| Energy & Atmosphere Optimize Energy Performance | 18 / 18 |
| Energy & Atmosphere Renewable Energy Production | 3 / 3 |
| Materials & Resources Building Life-Cycle Impact Reduction | 5 / 5 |
| Materials & Resources Construction & Demolition Waste Management | 2 / 2 |
| Indoor Environmental Quality Low-Emitting Materials | 3 / 3 |
| Indoor Environmental Quality Daylight | 3 / 3 |
| Water Efficiency Indoor Water Use Reduction | 6 / 6 |
The LEED Platinum threshold is 80 points. Energy, materials, daylight and water carried the score.
Read the case study · ZHI HeadquartersWe run them as a tracked engineering scope.
Proof from a published scorecard: ZHI Headquarters earned 5 / 5 on Building Life-Cycle Impact Reduction, 3 / 3 on Low-Emitting Materials and 2 / 2 on C&D Waste Management.
There is no LEED certificate for a paint, a panel or a chiller. A project’s LEED consultant accepts evidence that your product contributes to specific credits. We build that evidence file to the standard a GBCI reviewer expects, in both languages.
Credit by credit, which requirements your product meets under LEED v4, v4.1 and v5, with the supporting documents indexed.
SRI to ASTM E1980, VOC content and emissions, recycled content and origin: what you hold, what is missing, and which laboratory test closes the gap.
Programme operator, PCR, LCA scope, budget and timeline to a published EPD or HPD, so the product scores under the BPDO credits.
Independent EnergyPlus studies that quantify what the product does to cooling load, surface temperature, cost and CO₂ in a Saudi climate.
Stated up front, so offers can be compared like for like.
4 projects




Pick a discipline and tick what you need. Send the selection and its indicative budget range appears on screen and arrives in your inbox.
It depends on who is asking for it. Saudi government clients and master developers usually specify Mostadam; international tenants and lenders usually want LEED. Our feasibility study prices both, and one evidence set can serve both ratings.
LEED BD+C and O+M work for owners such as the Ministry of Environment, Water and Agriculture, the ZHI Headquarters scorecard we tracked to 80 of 110 points, and comparative energy studies such as the cool-wall coating study. Each project page shows the scope we carried.
The earlier the better, because design-phase credits close as the design closes. Starting after tender usually costs points rather than money, and our gap analysis tells you exactly which ones are still within reach.
Yes, and it is our most common arrangement. We carry the analysis and the documentation and work to the lead consultant's templates, so your team keeps the client relationship.

A question that is not here?
Ask the engineer who would run your project. Send the drawings and the answer comes back in writing.
Send a package and you get a scope, a fixed price and a delivery date within two working days.
HVAC, plumbing and plant-room design balanced against comfort, code compliance and what the building will cost to run.
Architectural documentation developed alongside the structure and the services, not handed over the fence to them.
Connection design, fabrication detailing and shop drawings a fabricator can put on the machine without redrawing them.















